OUR JUDGEMENTS
Please read stories of confident advocacy and discover how we dealt with complex legal situations and brought about wins grounded in legal acumen, client relations, and the pursuit of justice. We consistently strive for excellence and take pride in the collaborative efforts that highlight the synergy within our team. We hope you will find these cases interesting. Should you encounter a similar challenge, let us know if we can assist in any way.
COURAGE ADVOCACY
Trademarks, trade secrets, and patents constitute unique classifications of intellectual property. While understanding them may pose complexity, they provide substantial advantages to enterprises opting to protect their valuables. A compelling example of this phenomenon is highlighted in the Better Homes v Consep Home Ideas case – a pioneering instance in which we took pride in our involvement. You can access the full judgment through the following link: FULL JUDGMENT
THE CASE WE WON AGAINST ALL ODDS
The saying "actions speak louder than words" perfectly encapsulates the idea that one's actions can contradict their words. In the case of Carmody v Kudumela NO. and Others, Mathilda approached the court seeking permission to remove their business rescue practitioner. For Gittins Attorneys to work on this case was a great achievement and If you are interested in understanding how section 139 of the Companies Act can aid in removing a business rescue practitioner from office, due to reasons such as incompetence, conflict of interest, or lack of independence, access the full judgement here: FULL JUDGMENT
MOLDING THE CRYPTO LEGAL LANDSCAPE
If you want to gain a deeper understanding of South Africa's flourishing Crypto Market and its corresponding regulations, read the comprehensive ruling of Altcoin Trader v Basel by clicking on the provided link. Our involvement in this case sheds light on various aspects related to cryptocurrencies and the evolving legal framework surrounding it in the country.
BEYOND THE RULEBOOK: OUR QUEST FOR JUSTICE
It is important to highlight that South African law does not have a formally codified legal principle governing restraint of trade agreements. The complexity of this hurdle rendered our involvement and the ensuing triumph in the Hospitality Industrial and Commercial Underwriting Managers v Dietrich case is profoundly fulfilling. The case sheds light on the insightful repercussions and reparative measures that a defendant might encounter upon breaching their restraint of trade agreement. For a more comprehensive understanding, the complete judgment is accessible here.
SHAPING TOMORROW'S LAWS
Our participation in this case has left us with a profound sense of humility. Should you find yourself in a situation where your former spouse fails to fulfil their alimony obligations in South Africa, you may be contemplating the best course of action to take. This case provides valuable insight for anyone who might be interested in understanding the application of Rule 45(8)(c) of the Uniform Rules of Court, which addresses the attachment of movable or immovable assets under such circumstances. For a comprehensive insight, read the complete judgment in Riordan v First National Bank Limited 2014 JDR 1773 (GP)